Clarke's Law: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→Note) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
To use but one example, the [[Sycorax]] thought of [[blood control]] as form of sorcery and [[Tenth Doctor|the Doctor]] as a user of [[witchcraft]]. ([[DW]]: ''[[The Christmas Invasion]]'') | To use but one example, the [[Sycorax]] thought of [[blood control]] as form of sorcery and [[Tenth Doctor|the Doctor]] as a user of [[witchcraft]]. ([[DW]]: ''[[The Christmas Invasion]]'') | ||
[[Seventh Doctor|The Doctor]] reminded [[Ace]] of Clarke's Law and stated that "the reverse is also true". ([[DW]]: ''[[ | [[Seventh Doctor|The Doctor]] reminded [[Ace]] of Clarke's Law and stated that "the reverse is also true". ([[DW]]: ''[[Battlefield]]''). | ||
[[The Captain (Pirate Planet)|The Captain]] paraphrased this by describing now-wrecked craft had posessed technologies "indistinguishable from magic" ([[DW]]: ''[[The Pirate Planet]]''). | [[The Captain (Pirate Planet)|The Captain]] paraphrased this by describing now-wrecked craft had posessed technologies "indistinguishable from magic" ([[DW]]: ''[[The Pirate Planet]]''). | ||
Revision as of 04:04, 29 May 2007
Clarke's Law states that:
- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
To use but one example, the Sycorax thought of blood control as form of sorcery and the Doctor as a user of witchcraft. (DW: The Christmas Invasion)
The Doctor reminded Ace of Clarke's Law and stated that "the reverse is also true". (DW: Battlefield).
The Captain paraphrased this by describing now-wrecked craft had posessed technologies "indistinguishable from magic" (DW: The Pirate Planet).
Note
This principle often gets quoted as a singular statement. In fact, Arthur C. Clarke made it the third of three laws concerning predicting the future.
