Talk:Castrovalva (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Josiah Rowe (talk | contribs) ("People's Comments and Ratings"?) |
(→"People's Comments and Ratings": Response) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Do we want to have this sort of section or not? It seems to me that it opens up a can of worms, with the possibility of people arguing over their opinions of different stories. There are plenty of sites ([http://www.gallifreyone.com/reviews.php Outpost Gallifrey's Reviews page], [http://www.pagefillers.com/dwrg/ The Doctor Who Ratings Guide], to name but two) with reviews of ''Doctor Who'' stories. That shouldn't, I think, be the purpose of this site. '''TARDIS Index File''' should aspire to be an encyclopedia of ''Doctor Who'' facts, not opinions. --[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] 19:38, 15 Mar 2005 (GMT) | Do we want to have this sort of section or not? It seems to me that it opens up a can of worms, with the possibility of people arguing over their opinions of different stories. There are plenty of sites ([http://www.gallifreyone.com/reviews.php Outpost Gallifrey's Reviews page], [http://www.pagefillers.com/dwrg/ The Doctor Who Ratings Guide], to name but two) with reviews of ''Doctor Who'' stories. That shouldn't, I think, be the purpose of this site. '''TARDIS Index File''' should aspire to be an encyclopedia of ''Doctor Who'' facts, not opinions. --[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] 19:38, 15 Mar 2005 (GMT) | ||
:I would concur on this. In keeping with most other WikiMedia sites, ours should be a neutral point of view. Plus, quoting other people's reviews verbatim, even with the source cited, runs the risk of copyright infringement. --[[User:Freethinker1of1|Freethinker1of1]] 00:48, 16 Mar 2005 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 00:48, 16 March 2005
"People's Comments and Ratings"
Do we want to have this sort of section or not? It seems to me that it opens up a can of worms, with the possibility of people arguing over their opinions of different stories. There are plenty of sites (Outpost Gallifrey's Reviews page, The Doctor Who Ratings Guide, to name but two) with reviews of Doctor Who stories. That shouldn't, I think, be the purpose of this site. TARDIS Index File should aspire to be an encyclopedia of Doctor Who facts, not opinions. --Josiah Rowe 19:38, 15 Mar 2005 (GMT)
- I would concur on this. In keeping with most other WikiMedia sites, ours should be a neutral point of view. Plus, quoting other people's reviews verbatim, even with the source cited, runs the risk of copyright infringement. --Freethinker1of1 00:48, 16 Mar 2005 (GMT)
