User talk:82.28.170.35: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
No. Putting them at the bottom is best. If you simply put them at the top, then you wouldn't be scrolling down and seeing the others. If you simply put it at the top, there could end up being many duplicates of the same discontinuity. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 11:23, August 18, 2010 (UTC) | No. Putting them at the bottom is best. If you simply put them at the top, then you wouldn't be scrolling down and seeing the others. If you simply put it at the top, there could end up being many duplicates of the same discontinuity. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 11:23, August 18, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Ah I see, that makes sense, thanks | |||
Revision as of 11:03, 23 August 2010
New posts
New points on discontinuity pages go at the bottom of the page, not the top. The same goes for comments on talk pages. The Thirteenth Doctor 19:22, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Sorry didin't know about commenting proper practices. But, forgive me for asking? doesn't writing at the top make more sense? I mean if you are asking a question hoping to receive an answer then writing it at the top before the question which do have answers will increase the likelyhood that your question/discontinuity shall be answered/resolved.
No. Putting them at the bottom is best. If you simply put them at the top, then you wouldn't be scrolling down and seeing the others. If you simply put it at the top, there could end up being many duplicates of the same discontinuity. The Thirteenth Doctor 11:23, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
Ah I see, that makes sense, thanks
