Talk:Melody Pond (The Impossible Astronaut)

Keep calm and stay focused.

Please abide by our discussion policy and be nice to other editors in this discussion. Remember: this talk page is only for discussing the editing of the attached article. Take speculation to The Howling, our general discussion forum. Messages not having to do with the improvement of the article may be deleted.

Unknown

Not much to say really. We should implement it as "unknown" because the credit is usually a rank or office. I expecit this character will be named in part two, but I'll be useful for future reference.----Skittles the hog--Talk 20:16, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

Infobox name

It should be "Little girl". Across this wiki, more page have their title (i.e policeman, vicar, little girl, woman) as their name in the infobox. The name in the infobox should be the page name (bar anything in brackets). Mini-mitch\talk 20:16, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

Erm...why? Because "unknown" suggest we lack knowledge. Yeah, little girl, that's an individual's name. See Coolie (The Talons of Weng-Chiang) for an example of this implemented.----Skittles the hog--Talk 20:20, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

Because that's their name given in Doctor Who, and that's the name that should be given in the infobox. See:

• Vicar (Family of Blood)
• Vicar (Father's Day)
• Vicar (Remembrance of the Daleks)
• Vicar (The Next Doctor)
• Vicar (The Runaway Bride)
• Little Girl (The Runaway Bride)
• Man (Turn Left)
• Woman (Turn Left)
• Woman (Last of the Time Lords)

These are just a small amount of the page where an unnamed character has had their title as the infobox page name. It make sense to keep it that way. That is there name given in the DWU, so that's the name we give them. Not putting their given name in the infobox is like create the page called "Unknown Little Girl" Mini-mitch\talk 20:26, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

No, its not there name in Dr Who, just in the credits. Your only real argument is: this is what's going on at the moment. So, yes, it would take a while to implement. However, it will be good once it's finished.----Skittles the hog--Talk 20:29, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

Regarding killing the Doctor

After seeing next weeks episode (which by the way I have) you may be under the same impression as me that the little girl did not actually kill the Doctor - surley something like tht should not be put in till we actually have confirmation it was her who did it!91.108.5.196 18:28, April 24, 2011 (UTC)

We place as much information as we know from the stories that have been broadcast, if something changes in the next episode then we will just have to go back and sort things out. --Revan\Talk 18:31, April 24, 2011 (UTC)

My point is, even from the story, we dont know it was the little girl - the fact is we didnt see the face of the shooter... 91.108.5.196 18:34, April 24, 2011 (UTC)

We don't have any info to the contrary.----Skittles the hog--Talk 19:30, April 24, 2011 (UTC)

Then remove the information, otherwise it is speculation, and classified as incorrect until canonical confirmation. Rassilon of Old ^{(Talk - TTFF - Teru)} 14:22, April 25, 2011 (UTC)

Split page?

I know we have so little info but from what it looks like the little girl and the spaceman (or impossible astronaut) are two different enitiy's and should be seperated on this wiki as stated before there is no proof that it was the little girl that killed the doctor but the spaceman did! Lastly all we know so far is that she's wearing a spacesuit like the the one that the person (*coughcough*river*coughcough*) that killed the doctor did not that she is or wearing the one!

Beach Scene

Hi, I'm not really a contributer so feel free to ignore everything I say but I was wondering if you should add an image or a mention that when the 1,103 Doctor is on the beach and tells the Astronaut his know's who they are, their flesh seems to be rotted during the split second it lifts up the helmet Visor. Just incase you didn't notice and wanted to mention it in the article. 92.14.123.98 18:02, April 26, 2011 (UTC)

Little girl

Is she a time lord? She is seen regenerating near the end of Day of the Moon Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 17:50, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Please take this to the Howling. Thank you. Mini-mitch\talk 17:59, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Regeneration

At The End Of The Impossible Astronaut She Regenerated Which Leads Me To Beleive She Is The Doctors Daughter Or A Relative Of The Doctor Or Jenny(the doctors daughter)

Please take this to the Howling. Thank you. Mini-mitch\talk 17:59, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

time lord?

ok we know shes a time lord/lady but could she be the rani or river song or someone?

Please take this to the Howling. Thank you. --Revan\Talk 18:07, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Locked?

Why is this page locked? There is no reason whatsoever for it to be locked! I don't know why admins feel they have right now to do what they like -- Michael Downey 18:20, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Too much speculation was being added, so admins decided to lock it 24 hours. Mini-mitch\talk 18:23, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

This was a group decision from 3 admins, the page is a target of speculation and it is almost impossible to edit the page for speculatory edits. The page has been locked for 24 hours, if you want to add anything to the page please write your proposed entry on this talk page and we can then place it in the article. Thank you. --Revan\Talk 18:22, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Species

Now we are in a pickle for what species to stick her under, at the moment it is pure speculation to say she is a human/hybrid and Amy's child. The option that I think would work best would be to call her a Time Lady until we have confirmation that she is partly human too. --Revan\Talk 18:20, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

I agree with what's currently on the page - put her down as 'Unknown specie'. I've added warning to Day of the Moon and to this page telling Users not says she's a Time Lord. Mini-mitch\talk 18:25, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

She is definetley got Galifreyan/Time Lord in her but we should put her as Time Lord (Partly) or (Unconfirmed ).As we do not know who her parents are.The mysterious 18:41, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

She can't be a hybrid, the doctor stated that a half time lord couldn't regenerate in Journey's end. General MGD 109

But he was talking about the Meta Crisis Tenth Doctor (MCTD).. The MCTD was mostly human, so he couldn't. But if a Time Lord and a Human were to have a normal child birth, then their child could in fact regenerate. TheTARDIScontroller 18:55, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Exatcly, you three have proven the point of why she 'Unknown specie'. We don't what she yet. We may find out over the course of the series, but until we do, we leave her as unknown. If anyone is to chnage this once the page is unlocked, rest assure you will be blocked and the page will be locked again. Mini-mitch\talk 18:58, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

My theory on who the little girl is

I think the little girl is the daughter of Amy and Rory, who is also River Song.

Amy said to the Doctor that she is glad she's not pregnant because he child could have a "time head". I think this happened and that's how the little girl could regenerate.

I also think that the little girl (who i think is River) was in the space suit and killed the Doctor in 2011, in Utah. I think she is older and that that was the killing that go River imprisoned in the Stormcage.

Now how the Silence said to Amy that "Silence Will Fall, and you will help us", I think that their goal is to kill the Doctor and they will rule the universe. So what they said to Amy meant that she will give birth to River Song who will kill the Doctor, making the Silence rulers of the world.

To recap, the little girl is River Song - the daughter of Amy and Rory - and she has a "time head" ableling her to regenerate. She kills the Doctor in the spacesuit in Utah 2011, making the Silence rulers of the world. And the reason the Silence want the little girl to be looked after and not to die, is so their plan doesn't fail.

Take thsi to the Howling; the talk page banner is clear enough. Thank you. Mini-mitch\talk 19:07, April 30, 2011 (UTC)