More actions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
As a big nerd and a big video gamer, I feel I should point out that things done for gameplay purposes may not be canon. Sometimes, continuity sacrifices must be made for the purposes of making a good game. [[User:Sorryaboutthatchief|Sorryaboutthatchief]] 05:41, May 6, 2011 (UTC) | As a big nerd and a big video gamer, I feel I should point out that things done for gameplay purposes may not be canon. Sometimes, continuity sacrifices must be made for the purposes of making a good game. [[User:Sorryaboutthatchief|Sorryaboutthatchief]] 05:41, May 6, 2011 (UTC) | ||
I agree with Sorryaboutthatchief. I don't think Amy's regenerations in the game are meant to imply that Steven Moffat told Oli Smith that Amy is a Time Lady. Also, keep in mind that this isn't a cinematic, looks-like-an-animated-episode type of game; it's less directly representational than the Adventure Games. (Again, unlike the Adventure Games, we haven't heard from Moffat and Wegner that it definitely is part of the Doctor Who continuity anyway--but I think that, even if the game in general is considered canonical, I don't think this bit is.) --[[Special:Contributions/99.33.26.0|99.33.26.0]] 02:24, May 9, 2011 (UTC) |