Howling:Could River Song be a Time Lady?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In an interview, when he could have refused to answer or just said, "You'll have to watch the show to find out," Steven Moffatt said that River is 100% human and her species isn't what's mysterious about her. [[Special:Contributions/89.242.68.115|89.242.68.115]] 06:32, May 28, 2011 (UTC) | In an interview, when he could have refused to answer or just said, "You'll have to watch the show to find out," Steven Moffatt said that River is 100% human and her species isn't what's mysterious about her. [[Special:Contributions/89.242.68.115|89.242.68.115]] 06:32, May 28, 2011 (UTC) | ||
<p style="margin-left: 40px; ">Actually, I believe he said those two things in two different interviews. But then that just makes your point even better. --[[Special:Contributions/99.33.24.89|99.33.24.89]] 09:20, May 28, 2011 (UTC)</p> | |||
Revision as of 09:20, 28 May 2011
I've been having a discussion with a user on YouTube as to whether River Song could be a Time Lady under the effects of a perception filter and/or a chameleon arch. Their theories are interesting, but I disagree with them. I'm going to ask them to come here and lay out their theories, because I'm interested in what some other fans think, which is why I'm setting up this forum page for them. --The Thirteenth Doctor 09:25, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
In an interview, when he could have refused to answer or just said, "You'll have to watch the show to find out," Steven Moffatt said that River is 100% human and her species isn't what's mysterious about her. 89.242.68.115 06:32, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
Actually, I believe he said those two things in two different interviews. But then that just makes your point even better. --99.33.24.89 09:20, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
