Talk:Amy Pond (Ganger)

Could this article be merged back into the original?

Since the Ganger Amy was essentially being controlled by the real Amy - shouldn't this article be merged back with the original Amy article, seeing as how the real Amy and the ganger Amy were the same people? -- MisterRandom2 19:52, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Was she being controlled? Additionally, the grounds for the deletion of this article are ridiculous. A lack or knowledge does not mean the page should be deleted. She was ganger, fact. Alternations do need to be made though.----Skittles the hog--Talk 19:54, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Gangers are supposed to be controlled by the originals - with the exception of what happened in TRF/TAP. So, the REAL Amy has been unconscious and controlling her clone this whole time, while being unaware of her true state. That's why the Ganger version kept seeing visions of the eye patch lady. -- MisterRandom2 19:58, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

And there's also the fact that if the Ganger Amy was a real independently functioning clone, the Doctor wouldn't have just arbitrarily destroyed her. Not after all that business about how independent Gangers should be treated like humans. -- MisterRandom2 20:01, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Plus when Ganger Amy is destroyed the real one wakes up, quite obviously surprised to find herself there. And why would the Doctor tell her they were coming to find her if she was an independent clone that would forget everything when destroyed? TemporalSpleen 20:27, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

That makes sense, but it is still a different character, albeit very loosely.----Skittles the hog--Talk 19:59, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, but for the sake of simplicity and organization it would probably be better. -- MisterRandom2 20:01, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

And before anyone gets started with a "But we have a separate page for the Auton Rory!" argument - that's different because the real Rory was dead/erased from the time line and the Auton version really was a separate character. The Ganger Amy IS the real Amy - just not physically. She's an avatar of the real Amy - who his alive and has (presumably) been unconscious this whole time. -- MisterRandom2 20:13, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Deletion

Firstly, all the information should be copied back to the orginal Amy Pond page. Secondly, we do not know when she became a Ganger, so to start with 'America' is guesswork. She could have became a Ganger at any point in her life. However, if people really want this page, then all the information should be moved to the orginal place and all that should be added is a couple of sentences about the last scenes from "The Almost People". Mini-mitch\talk 19:55, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Nope. She was a ganger. This is a different character. Why should it be deleted? Because of a lack of knowledge?----Skittles the hog--Talk 19:56, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

So do you know when she became a ganger? No. It was never mentioned in the episode. Until we do know, all the copied and pasted information about Amy Pond should be placed back into the article apart from the information we know about the last few scenes from the Alomst People. This page is guesswork and speculation, one fans guess at when the Ganger was created. If people think she became a Ganger before she met the Doctor, you are suggesting they can dd it to the page. Does that seem fair? No. Because it's speculation which should not, be added to articles. It's is pure speculation to say she became a Ganger in America. The only information that should be on this page is info we know. Not what we guess. Mini-mitch\talk 20:01, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Your stating what I already have. I was just clearing up that your "deletion" tag was unjustified.----Skittles the hog--Talk 20:04, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

You can tell when I feel very passioate about a subject, I do apologise. So should the information copied from the Amy Pond page be put back until we know exactly when she was take? It is speculation otherwise. If I'm wrong I will hold my hands up and the information can be re added. Mini-mitch\talk 20:08, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I have noticed you get a bit passionate :), not that its a bad thing! Yeah, put the info back and we'll have to make some sort of summary here.----Skittles the hog--Talk 20:10, May 28, 2011 (UTC)