User talk:Blightsoot: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<p style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-top: 0.4em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">He was cursed at because my edit was simply flat reverted without a stated reason. Such arrogance of removing decent edits without a good given stated reason is bad form, and will successfully wind people up. [[User:Blightsoot|Blightsoot]] 22:46, May 30, 2011 (UTC)</p>
<p style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; margin-top: 0.4em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">He was cursed at because my edit was simply flat reverted without a stated reason. Such arrogance of removing decent edits without a good given stated reason is bad form, and will successfully wind people up. [[User:Blightsoot|Blightsoot]] 22:46, May 30, 2011 (UTC)</p>


::It's a wiki, open to everyone. Reverts frequently happen without reasons/summaries given. While yes, obviously everyone should say why an edit is reverted, it's not always going to happen. Cursing out someone for doing so isn't going to make it any better. Please refrain from doing that in edits in the future; if you have an issue with someone, discuss it civilly on their Talk page. Thanks. [[User:Witoki|Witoki]] 22:50, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
::It's a wiki, open to everyone. Reverts frequently happen without reasons/summaries given. While yes, obviously everyone should say why an edit is reverted, it's not always going to happen. Cursing out someone for doing so isn't going to make it any better. Please refrain from doing that in edits in the future; if you have an issue with someone, discuss it civilly on their Talk page. Thanks. [[User:Witoki|Witoki]] 22:50, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
::
: I'll do as I please. If you don't like it, I couldn't care less. No you won't get a summary all the time - this is how we're in this situation. An assumption that because my edit count is low that I know nothing about Wiki's. It's a great excuse to be lazy so arrogant editors can go around simply reverting "no-brainer" additions to articles without looking at it or giving a good reason. It's amateur hour for wiki-wannabee's if I'm being honest. I mean take the non-canon that's spewed around the vast majority of articles - the place is a joke. But if you don't want help from new people that's fine - I'll disappear back to en:wiki and you can carry on the pervasive challenge of chasing away new people in the most condescending ways possible. [[User:Blightsoot|Blightsoot]] 23:00, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:00, 30 May 2011

Manners

Cursing while calling someone out for their "manners" while reverting an edit? I think the one with the problem here is you. Witoki 22:34, May 30, 2011 (UTC)


He was cursed at because my edit was simply flat reverted without a stated reason. Such arrogance of removing decent edits without a good given stated reason is bad form, and will successfully wind people up. Blightsoot 22:46, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

It's a wiki, open to everyone. Reverts frequently happen without reasons/summaries given. While yes, obviously everyone should say why an edit is reverted, it's not always going to happen. Cursing out someone for doing so isn't going to make it any better. Please refrain from doing that in edits in the future; if you have an issue with someone, discuss it civilly on their Talk page. Thanks. Witoki 22:50, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
I'll do as I please. If you don't like it, I couldn't care less. No you won't get a summary all the time - this is how we're in this situation. An assumption that because my edit count is low that I know nothing about Wiki's. It's a great excuse to be lazy so arrogant editors can go around simply reverting "no-brainer" additions to articles without looking at it or giving a good reason. It's amateur hour for wiki-wannabee's if I'm being honest. I mean take the non-canon that's spewed around the vast majority of articles - the place is a joke. But if you don't want help from new people that's fine - I'll disappear back to en:wiki and you can carry on the pervasive challenge of chasing away new people in the most condescending ways possible. Blightsoot 23:00, May 30, 2011 (UTC)