Forum:Template:bp not working properly: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->On pages like Escape to LA, the [[Template:bp|bp...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} | {{Forumheader|Panopticon}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->On pages like [[Escape to LA]], the [[Template:bp|bp]] template doesn't seem to be working properly, with it repeating examples despite them only being entered once. Does anyone know why it does this? -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 16:12, August 14, 2011 (UTC) | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->On pages like [[Escape to LA]], the [[Template:bp|bp]] template doesn't seem to be working properly, with it repeating examples despite them only being entered once. Does anyone know why it does this? -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 16:12, August 14, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Fixed that. | |||
:I'd made a mistake with the numbers in the template, a couple of numbers were in there twice, hence the repeating on the article. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 17:29, August 14, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:29, 14 August 2011
Index → Panopticon → Template:bp not working properly
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
On pages like Escape to LA, the bp template doesn't seem to be working properly, with it repeating examples despite them only being entered once. Does anyone know why it does this? -- Tybort (talk page) 16:12, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed that.
- I'd made a mistake with the numbers in the template, a couple of numbers were in there twice, hence the repeating on the article. --Tangerineduel / talk 17:29, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
