Talk:Voyage of the Damned (TV story): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(New page: Technically, they *could* leave previous Doctors out of this episode and still be logically consistent. It could be that, with all his visits to the past since then, he altered the course ...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Technically, they *could* leave previous Doctors out of this episode and still be logically consistent. It could be that, with all his visits to the past since then, he altered the course of events that led him to the Titanic before. --[[User:68.44.13.236|68.44.13.236]] 18:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | Technically, they *could* leave previous Doctors out of this episode and still be logically consistent. It could be that, with all his visits to the past since then, he altered the course of events that led him to the Titanic before. --[[User:68.44.13.236|68.44.13.236]] 18:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
The episode was '''crap'''. I didn't get it until reading it here. Humans on a futuristic spaceship in the 21st century? And that Max Capricorn was a joke if you ask me. We have had heads in tanks [[Face of Boe|before]]. Who had thought the evil guy behind it all was a shopping trolley with a head. The evil dudeArnie 10:17, 26 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:17, 26 December 2007
Technically, they *could* leave previous Doctors out of this episode and still be logically consistent. It could be that, with all his visits to the past since then, he altered the course of events that led him to the Titanic before. --68.44.13.236 18:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
The episode was crap. I didn't get it until reading it here. Humans on a futuristic spaceship in the 21st century? And that Max Capricorn was a joke if you ask me. We have had heads in tanks before. Who had thought the evil guy behind it all was a shopping trolley with a head. The evil dudeArnie 10:17, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
