Talk:2000s: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: Of course it ended in December 2009. I thought that was common sense. How is 2010 in any way part of the decade called the 2000s? This isn't like centuries and millennia where it's up in the air whether the 20th century ends in 1999 or 2000, now, is it? -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 09:55, October 9, 2011 (UTC) | : Of course it ended in December 2009. I thought that was common sense. How is 2010 in any way part of the decade called the 2000s? This isn't like centuries and millennia where it's up in the air whether the 20th century ends in 1999 or 2000, now, is it? -- [[User:Tybort|Tybort]] ([[User talk:Tybort|talk page]]) 09:55, October 9, 2011 (UTC) | ||
: Where douse it say that starting on 1 douse not generally apply for decades? | : Where douse it say that starting on 1 instead of 0 douse not generally apply for decades? | ||
Revision as of 11:44, 9 October 2011
I tried to add some of the events from 2010 since 2010 was technically part of the 00s but they where deleated due to a mathematical disagreement that the 00s ended in 2009. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.206.89.251 (talk).
- Of course it ended in December 2009. I thought that was common sense. How is 2010 in any way part of the decade called the 2000s? This isn't like centuries and millennia where it's up in the air whether the 20th century ends in 1999 or 2000, now, is it? -- Tybort (talk page) 09:55, October 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Where douse it say that starting on 1 instead of 0 douse not generally apply for decades?
