Talk:Order of the Headless: Difference between revisions
m (moved Talk:Headless monk to Talk:Order of the Headless) |
TheTrueDoc (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Mentions are allowed. [[User:Bold Clone]] reverted the mention as he didn't recall it, and then again as there isn't actually a mentioned section '''in the infobox'''. The mention is still, well, mentioned in the article body.----<u>[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small></u> 19:09, June 20, 2011 (UTC) | Mentions are allowed. [[User:Bold Clone]] reverted the mention as he didn't recall it, and then again as there isn't actually a mentioned section '''in the infobox'''. The mention is still, well, mentioned in the article body.----<u>[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small></u> 19:09, June 20, 2011 (UTC) | ||
I think the mention in Time and Angels needs to be put up [[User:TheTrueDoc|TheTrueDoc]] <sup>[[User talk:TheTrueDoc|talk to me]]</sup> 17:35, November 1, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:35, 1 November 2011
Please abide by our discussion policy and be nice to other editors in this discussion. Remember: this talk page is only for discussing the editing of the attached article. Take speculation to The Howling, our general discussion forum. Messages not having to do with the improvement of the article may be deleted.
Mentions?
Can someone explain to me why the mention of the Headless Monks in Time of Angels has been removed? The user that originally removed the mention explicitly claimed they did not recall the mention as justification for removing it. After it being pointed out, they've then claimed that mentions aren't allowed. But as far as I can tell there are plenty of pages on this wiki with lists of mentions in the box (Dalek jumps out at me for instance). Am I missing some of this wiki's policy? - I have my own wiki to run, so I generally don't get overly caught up in others; but this seems a little bit of a weird procedure to me. Baziel 18:47, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
Mentions are allowed. User:Bold Clone reverted the mention as he didn't recall it, and then again as there isn't actually a mentioned section in the infobox. The mention is still, well, mentioned in the article body.----Skittles the hog--Talk 19:09, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
I think the mention in Time and Angels needs to be put up TheTrueDoc talk to me 17:35, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
