Talk:Flying saucer: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(+reply) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Yes, many ships here probably do deserve their own pages. And maybe we should have a flying saucer category (but still keep general information on this page). {{:User:Ghelæ/sig}} 15:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC) | :Yes, many ships here probably do deserve their own pages. And maybe we should have a flying saucer category (but still keep general information on this page). {{:User:Ghelæ/sig}} 15:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
:a category might be an useful addition, but the info contained on this page in the intro text and behind the scenes section are notable even if some of the rest of the info could better be placed on individual pages. Thus, info should be moved as much as possible, and perhaps a category created to augment the usefulness, but the page itself should, in a reduced form, most defiantly stay. -- [[User:Capricorn|Capricorn]] 16:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:05, 8 April 2008
We should probably keep this page, but most of the individual ships mentioned deserve their own page imo -- Capricorn 10:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Maybe Flying Saucer should be a category?--Skittles the hog File:Mini blowfish.jpg 10:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, many ships here probably do deserve their own pages. And maybe we should have a flying saucer category (but still keep general information on this page). ~ Ghelæ -talk-contribs 15:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- a category might be an useful addition, but the info contained on this page in the intro text and behind the scenes section are notable even if some of the rest of the info could better be placed on individual pages. Thus, info should be moved as much as possible, and perhaps a category created to augment the usefulness, but the page itself should, in a reduced form, most defiantly stay. -- Capricorn 16:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
