Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Tales from the Tardis/@comment-188432-20130325173913/@comment-5442547-20130415202707

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Tales from the Tardis‎ | @comment-188432-20130325173913
Revision as of 15:52, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

CzechOut wrote: But anyway the point is that we all agree that there is doubt, introduced by the key creatives, as to whether Vienna is in the DWU. Everyone in this discussion agrees to that. Consensus is actually to throw Vienna out, because everyone says that one reading of the statements given is that Vienna is not a spin-off of DW. We disagree only about the level of ambiguity of that statement, not about whether that is a plausible reading.

Almost no one agrees that it should be thrown out...I don't know where you got that they do from.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.