Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1296654-20200616211544/@comment-6032121-20200616230807

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-1296654-20200616211544
Revision as of 20:42, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I don't know, is there any interesting precedent on this? I feel like if we were told that (say) Amy Pond, daughter of Augustus Pond and Tabetha Pond had an offscreen older brother called Preston, we wouldn't actually need a confirmation of the full name to put it at Preston Pond rather than Preston (Doctor Who and the Thought Experiment). I could be wrong. If a case like my thought experiment could be found, presumably not about as high-profile a character as Amy, that'd be grand, but I have no idea how to even start searching.

(I don't actually think the comparison to 'dancing' in The Doctor Dances is as apt as all that. I mean yes, it's an example of us exercising some common sense about stuff that is never voiced in so many words, but made explicit on other ways. But it's quite a different situation. If nothing else, that issue has nothing to do with page naming, even though that is its own set of conventions separate from what is speculation; it's not speculation that the guy from the ambulance was called 'Bruce Gerhardt', but it's still not good enough for it to be the page name.)

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.