Talk:Nuclear weapon

Nuclear pages

Currently, nuclear missile redirects here. It should have its own page, as should nuclear bomb, with the information from here being used to fill them and this becoming the article for nuclear weaponry. At least, that's my assertion. Is anyone of a different opinion?--Skittles the hog - talk 15:09, October 6, 2014 (UTC)

It may be not a proper in-universe perspective, but I would have one single page for weapon/missile/bomb, or at least for weapon/bomb. We could use subsections (and redirects to subsections) if we wanted to discern them.--HarveyWallbanger ☎ 17:07, October 6, 2014 (UTC)

Well, you've given the reason why that shouldn't be the case: it's not the proper in-universe perspective. They're not the same, so they deserve their own pages.--Skittles the hog - talk 18:00, October 6, 2014 (UTC)

I think it all should be on one page. A missile is by definition a weapon, and so is a bomb. Surely a nuclear missile and a nuclear bomb are both nuclear weapons then? --Ilyootha ☎ 11:18, October 11, 2014 (UTC)

Beef and ham are both kinds of meat. That doesn't mean they shouldn't have their own pages. That sort of system should be used here: with nuclear weapon being an overview with the detailed information being on separate pages.--Skittles the hog - talk 13:32, October 11, 2014 (UTC)