Template talk:Dreyfus

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Revision as of 22:02, 7 January 2018 by Amorkuz (talk | contribs) (T:IU)

Prop delete

He's the first incarnation according to Big Finish, and there is no evidence to discourage what thy are saying.BananaClownMan 19:46, January 7, 2018 (UTC)

I've removed the delete tag, as it is causing havoc with the template's use on other pages. I am posting its text here:
delete|Is it an incarnation separate from that played by other actors, in particular, by William Hughes? Do we know for sure which incarnation it is? Is there a subsection of The Master page dedicated wholly to this incarnation?
Shambala108 21:47, January 7, 2018 (UTC)
Hmm, do you, User:BananaClownMan, mean to say that all the changes made to multiple pages are based on an out-of-universe statement by Big Finish Productions? I listened to The Destination Wars and did not find any statement regarding where in his regeneration cycle the Master was at the time. If I missed something, please provide a quote. Otherwise, Tardis:In-universe perspective demands that all the relevant edits be undone. Let me quote that policy directly:

Use only valid sources — which is to say narratives — to write your article. Material from reference works, deleted scenes, or documentaries can only go in "behind the scenes" sections. [Tardis:In-universe perspective [src]]

I would, therefore, greatly appreciate it if you either provide in-universe proof of the fact or remove the fact from the pages you edited.
Now, I am glad that the template caught my eye and we have the opportunity to check everything thoroughly. But beyond it, what is the purpose of this template? And why is this template named after Dreyfus rather than Hughes, who, according to you, played the same incarnation. Hughes was much earlier (in all senses). What is the watershed moment separating them? Quite bluntly, why should there be a template to describe just one story? And how is it possible to assign comic and prose stories published much earlier and, hence, without any notion of Dreyfus ever playing this role, to the period supposedly covered by this template. How can an editor of The Dark Path, published in 1997 and featuring material in the same subsection on the Master's page, supposed to know to use this template, which is based on an actor debuting in the role in 2017? What is the connection between Dreyfus and The Nameless City, another story featured in the same subsection? Amorkuz 22:02, January 7, 2018 (UTC)