User talk:A stitch in time 2

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Revision as of 11:49, 4 July 2020 by A stitch in time 2 (talk | contribs) (→‎A Stitch in Time)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Welcome to the Tardis:About A stitch in time 2

Thanks for your edits! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is a great time to have joined us, because now you can play the Game of Rassilon with us and win cool stuff! Well, okay, badges. That have no monetary value. And that largely only you can see. But still: they're cool!

We've got a couple of important quirks for a Wikia wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.
British English, please
We generally use British English round these parts, so if you're American, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.
Spoilers aren't cool
We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.
Other useful stuff
Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:

If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! —  you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:
~ ~ ~ ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask on my talk page. Doug86 08:25, July 3, 2020 (UTC)

A Stitch in Time

Oh, I don't deny its validity. It's just you have referenced it incorrectly.

You edit is as such;

Taking a break in 2012 Manhattan, Rory was transported to 1938 by the Weeping Angels while he was getting coffee. While the Doctor read Melody Malone: Private Detective in Old New York Town to Amy, they realised it was written by River Song, and that it was also about the events unfolding around them. Improvising "landing lights", the Doctor landed in the time energy-saturated era and reunited with River, though Rory had already been transported to Winter Quay by baby Angels. After reading one of the book's chapter titles that hinted that Amy would be separated from him for good, the Doctor desperately tried changing the book's outcome. Searching for Rory in the Quay, they found him in a room where an elderly Rory died before their eyes. The Doctor realised the Angels had covertly taken over Manhattan, and transported people into the past, trapping them in the Quay to feed on. (COMIC: A Stitch in Time)

This makes it look like the majority of The Angels Take Manhattan as happening in the comic.

The reference should look like this to separate the two accounts.

The Doctor realised the Angels had covertly taken over Manhattan, and transported people into the past, trapping them in the Quay to feed on. (TV: The Angels Take Manhattan) Then something involving a Time Weaver happened. (COMIC: A Stitch in Time)

Apologies if I have caused unwarranted frustration. I have yet to find a way to read A Stitch in Time myself, but I hope this explanation is satisfactory.BananaClownMan 11:47, July 4, 2020 (UTC)

okay cheers. A stitch in time 2 11:49, 4 July, 2020 (UTC)