Talk:Shakedown (novelisation)
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Novel or novelisation?
Is there a reason this page is titled Shakedown (novel) instead of Shakedown (novelisation)? Was it a deliberate decision, since a large part of the book is original material rather than an adaptation of the video, or was it just a glitch? —Josiah Rowe talk to me 22:57, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Eight months later, and nobody's answered this... —Josiah Rowe ☎ 07:23, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Bumping this again 92 months later. I see no reason for this page not to be dabbed novelisation, like all others. I imagine this was just an oversight somewhere along the line.
× SOTO (☎/✍/↯) 03:19, September 4, 2020 (UTC)- Ah, SOTO, you beat me to it. But I concur. Epsilon the Eternal ☎ 03:20, September 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Downtime (novelisation) is ample precedent. Though I really feel that with talk page discussions like this, Talk:Lolita, and Talk:Sleepy (novel) it might behoove someone to go through and find all talk page discussions that have petered out over the years. Just. Wow that would be a task better suited for a bot. Najawin ☎ 03:59, September 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Alright, almost ten years later... case closed, as pointed out, there's more than enough precedent for this to be dabbed as a (novelisation). OncomingStorm12th ☎ 21:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Downtime (novelisation) is ample precedent. Though I really feel that with talk page discussions like this, Talk:Lolita, and Talk:Sleepy (novel) it might behoove someone to go through and find all talk page discussions that have petered out over the years. Just. Wow that would be a task better suited for a bot. Najawin ☎ 03:59, September 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, SOTO, you beat me to it. But I concur. Epsilon the Eternal ☎ 03:20, September 4, 2020 (UTC)
- Bumping this again 92 months later. I see no reason for this page not to be dabbed novelisation, like all others. I imagine this was just an oversight somewhere along the line.
