Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Howling:River Song is a....... MAJOR SPOLIERS!!!

The Howling
Revision as of 17:12, 22 April 2010 by Lokiofmidgaard (talk | contribs)
The Howling → River Song is a....... MAJOR SPOLIERS!!!
There be spoilers about un-released stories here.
Run back to the forums if you're scared.


This content has been found on (see below) and is a major spoiler and is an official statement into what happens in the Time of Angels and to who River Song is. The Statement is as follows:

[River has] been in prison for a long time for murdering somebody… She [has] killed ‘the best man she ever knew’. River is allowed to leave prison because her archaeological expertise is needed to confirm that a piece of art in a collector’s hands is a Weeping Angel. She thinks it’s a Weeping Angel rather than just a sculpture, but she needs the Doctor to confirm it. There’s a party in a spaceship where the statue is being held and everybody seems to be in 1940’s outfits. The Doctor, Amy and River [get] stuck in a forest, with Weeping Angels peeping out from behind trees. These Angels are much more frightening than before. It’s terrifying. River has a book that contains images of all the Doctors and their adventures, past and future. It’s also the map of their relationship, but he’s not allowed to see it! At the end of the two episodes, the Doctor asks if he can trust her. River Song says, “Yes, you can, but what would be the fun in that?”

The content was found on here http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/time-of-angels-spoilers-4575.htm

So what do you think??? There is many speculation on the blog of the website indicating that she meets the 12th Doctor and kills him and then meets the previous incarnations. So could she be the person who finishes it for the last regernation of the doctor???? -- Michael Downey 14:02, April 22, 2010 (UTC)


What do I think? I think you are unbelievably ignorant to put one of the spoilers in the TITLE of your post. The title that anyone visiting the site sees as part of the "recent changes" so that it spoils the episode for them. If someone goes looking opening up a post that says there are spoilers within, then they can't complain about spoilage; if they choose to enter the forum where they know spoilers might be posted, then, again, it's tough luck if you get spoiled. But to put a spoiler in the title which will automatically be seen by anyone who visits the site? That's the original poster at fault. Lokiofmidgaard 17:12, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.