User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200905235227/@comment-45692830-20200910033409

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-1432718-20200905235227
Revision as of 13:31, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I don't think that follows. We have Doctor Who spinoffs that aren't covered by this wiki or are ruled invalid. Why would we immediately assume that there's a causal relationship between the validity of "a mainline work"'s validity status and its spinoff works'?

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-1432718-20200905235227/@comment-45692830-20200910033409&oldid=3500915"