Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252/@comment-1789834-20170416231109

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-2.26.183.189-20170416191252
Revision as of 13:49, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Actually we're both wrong. He says "We need to get back to the future. 2017 needs us." Those words are exact. We mustn't paraphrase in these debates. However, I'm also wrong because I forgot it ends with them being cornered by the Dalek with no means of escape. My memory evidently served me wrong, thinking they were rushing away.

I don't remember this "pocket of time" that CoT is talking about so that requires me to find the clip again. The thing that you need to realise Ottsel, and I mean this with all due respect, is that intent of the writer isn't everything. It's one corner of validity debates. If intent of writer was everything then we wouldn't have a whole page dedicated to the "rules".

It has nothing to do with my personal beliefs. I'd love this to fit in objectively and give us a time period for The Pilot. If I can find this gap that CoT talks about, then I'd jump ship and agree with you both. I'm scouring numerous react channels now because I'm too lazy to sit through the whole thing. Bear with me.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.