User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-25421326-20200308132630/@comment-27089953-20200506103006

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-25421326-20200308132630
Revision as of 14:07, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

My understanding with canon is that it's not continuity, by that I mean a story can count on the sole basis that it's official regardless if some event or statement in it may contradict another story. I'm fine with having DCTT as "valid" or "canon" just like how I'm okay with acknowledging two instances of the same events such as with Shada and Human Nature. The concept of time travel also allows for contradictions of continuity due to ie. the butterly effect.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-25421326-20200308132630/@comment-27089953-20200506103006&oldid=3503097"