User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-25421326-20200308132630/@comment-27321963-20200506134403

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-25421326-20200308132630
Revision as of 14:07, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I think the original post in this thread is extremely well put together, and I completely agree with the proposal.

The main thing to take away here is "validity isn’t canonicity". If the entire reason that this story is invalid stems from the fact that the Seventh Doctor died before the TV movie, how can we then go on to consider work such as the recent 'Doctor Who and the Time War' short story valid?

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-25421326-20200308132630/@comment-27321963-20200506134403&oldid=3503099"