User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-27343779-20191011001125

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-31010985-20190928203157
Revision as of 14:29, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
If the issue of Arcbeatle Press being a self-publisher is not relevant, why was it mentioned in the OP?

It was mentionned solely because --if i read the OP correctly-- it was raised by some in the deleted thread as being synonymous with fan fiction.

With due respect, as long as this connection is not unambiguously established following the rules or precedents of the wiki, I sincerely don't see the point of debating whether it's self- or third-party publication.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-27343779-20191011001125&oldid=3504446"