User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-38288735-20191202030415

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-31010985-20191101112654
Revision as of 14:33, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Yes, it seems like closing the previous discussion based on Rule 4 rather than the Rule 2 that was anticipated left people feeling like they hadn't had an opportunity to address that side of the discussion; they never talked about Rule 4 because they expected it to hinge on Rule 2.

I see how the fear of "wiki creep" is a real issue, with things spreading out further and further from Doctor Who, but, with this particular crossover, we already have a statement from the creator that the universe is, as a whole, non-DWU. We have a solid "The buck stops here" for anything not included in crossovers ever being considered valid for inclusion, so it seems just like other non-DWU crossovers in that there's a firm line between anything that's a licensed crossover and anything that's not.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-31010985-20191101112654/@comment-38288735-20191202030415&oldid=3504637"