User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-26975268-20130513164916

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359
Revision as of 14:35, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

But what if there's no mention of the contrafibularity flu in the original novel? I think we should cover both, but, if anything contradicts, the original novel takes precedence.

Hence, if both mention the flu, we only say that the Doctor caught it. If only the audio mentions the flu, then we say that Jason caught it.

I believe this is Tangerineduel's stance as well.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-26975268-20130513164916&oldid=3504771"