User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510142845

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359
Revision as of 14:35, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I mean Buried Treasures, sorry. Gary Russell said it. I'll try to transcribe it later. Anyway, if the BBC does not own Bernice, the copyright situation is the same for both her and Vienna, so it should not be a surprise. Legally, for copyright reason, any spin-off that is not owned nor licensed by the BBC can officially claim to be a spin-off or to take place in the Doctor Who universe, whether it's Vienna, Bernice or K-9 the series.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510142845&oldid=3504777"