User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4000564-20200326121602/@comment-1432718-20200425044747

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4000564-20200326121602
Revision as of 14:36, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This thread is operating under a common mistake. Many users seem to feel that inclusion debates are settled by checking off the boxes of the "four little rules" and that's that. That has never been the case, however. The four little rules are a guideline for determining validity, but they are just a part of Tardis:Valid sources. We take the entire policy into account when determining validity.

And, as such, Tardis:Valid sources has ruled that the information from DWBIT (aside from the comic stories, which do have articles) is not valid. This is similar to the reasoning behind not allowing any story info on merchandise packaging.