User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4028641-20180116092358

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20151007072528
Revision as of 14:39, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Frankly Shambala108, under the current conditions and standards of the inclusion debates I have to refuse your compromise. We haven't seen a thread closed in favour of validity in a very long time, (I believe the last case was the Dr. Men series) and any forum that moves even a step closer towards changing policy is left to rot. I'm not criticising past closings by any means, but until I see even a hint that a story being turned from invalid to valid is realistic with our current system I will not, by any means, support a "temporary" purge of content.

Declaring that all videos games must now be invalid to be litigated over later is sentencing them to a slow, painful death.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4028641-20180116092358&oldid=3505038"