Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170224222348

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170222073756
Revision as of 14:43, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Can I ask a question and get an honest, non-sarcastic, non-anything remark? Let's say they write a new episode of Top Cat and they get the rights from the BBC to use the Daleks as an adversary of Top Cat in one of the episodes? The Daleks enter through a portal of some kind into the Top Cat Universe and wreak havoc. Their plans are thwarted and blah, blah, blah.

Does the licensing of the Daleks (that sounds like a really silly episode of Classic Who haha) make that episode of Top Cat valid? To me, it wouldn't be so because it's set in the Top Cat Universe and not the DWU (which we all know represents a multiverse). It seems to me that this Wiki tends to absorb other universes into the DWU just because there's a license attached to a story. It absorbs the Prime Universe just because of Assimilation2, as a prime example (no pun intended). So, the license would render the TCU a part of the DWU?

I'd just like to know how we sit. And, I'd like to point out I'm saying this only because I care for the Wiki. It wasn't long ago, some people were petitioning to absorb the whole of the Baker's End Universe in because Vince Cosmos decided to go a-wandering into that audio series.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.