User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170305055031

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170222073756
Revision as of 14:44, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I'll be honest, you're not seeing what I'm saying. There's no point anybody here continuing to talk or raise points because you won't accept them.

A DWU =/= The DWU

These are indeed Daleks. We agree on something. But are they the Daleks? Or are they alternate Daleks? It's not difficult. You're not proving anything here. You're saying a DWU means the DWU. That makes no sense.

DWU is a multiverse, I get that. It doesn't mean there's any form of connection anywhere with a LEGO DWU. That's why some of us are sceptical. I'm getting frustrated here because I seriously don't understand how you don't see my point of view. For a LEGO DWU to be valid/legit/whatever, there needs to be a fine connection. Saying "they're Daleks" isn't the connection. I'm pretty sure there are parallel Daleks outside of the Whoniverse just waiting to be explored. Had the Doctor never visited Pete's World, those Cybermen would be invalid.

Please see my point. / On the verge of tears here /

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-1789834-20170305055031&oldid=3505327"