User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-24894325-20170224210427

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170222073756
Revision as of 14:45, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

OttselSpy25 wrote: Even if one of those dimensions isn't a Who Dimension, we still have an explanation.

This point is absolutely crucial because an explanation does not suffice to pass Rule 4. Let me quote:

If a story was intended to be set outside the DWU, then it's probably not allowed.Rule 4

It was pointed out in other discussions that DWU is really a multi-verse. However, it may or may not be the same as the multiverse of the movie. And we are not allowed to speculate that it is. Only a direct connection can establish this.

Let me emphasise once again that neither LEGO canon nor LEGO Dimensions is relevant here as they are not (yet) part of DWU.

PS I understand your frustration that the movie did not cover it because it was not crucial to the movie's plot. But it not being crucial to the plot is also telling.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-24894325-20170224210427&oldid=3505381"