User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170224224719

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170222073756
Revision as of 14:47, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Amorkuz wrote: You explained how DWU is treated in other invalid sources of the LEGO franchise.

Strawman.

It was declared invalid because of the minor RPG elements of the game. The narrative itself was deemed entirely valid, and since it is part of the LEGO canon, it is very important to deciding if non-video game Doctor Who products in this range are valid.

Once again: Just because we declare something invalid doesn't mean that we get to pretend that it doesn't exist in discussion. Non-valid doesn't mean non-canon.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170224224719&oldid=3505519"