User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170226025109

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170222073756
Revision as of 14:48, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

So reading through as many quotes as I could find, I think the opposing argument that stands up the most is the "Real world" dimension, which according to quotes I read isn't as dead as you'd expect. Technically this doesn't have anything to do with LEGO Batman the singular-film-that-actually exists, but it could have an effect on how we view the context that they made the movie in.

The quote I read didn't seem to suggest that it was still all about the one kid from the first movie, but it did promise more interactions between the two universes seen in the first film -- particularly with LEGO Ninjago.

My only problem with this is the comment that they "are still figuring out the rules." It just seems to me that all of this is very much a work in progress production, and even then we don't know what they have planned right now. It's a concept they, once again, could go many places with.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170226025109&oldid=3505562"