User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170428002314

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170222073756
Revision as of 14:50, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Thefartydoctor wrote: I'm not being funny with anyone here but you can't say "they're from the DWU".

The DWU is so fickle and hard-to-define. Trying to prove what "The DWU" is is basically literally just like trying to define canon.

Are the BBC books "the DWU?" Are the Sixth Doctor comics "the DWU?" Is Lungbarrow "the DWU?" Is Rose-the-cat "the DWU?" And now, is Dr. Men "the DWU?"

All we can really do is accept that each and every medium scanned the DWU into their minds and then made stories to add to them. The process for creating a BBC novel in that sense was identical to that of creating Dr. Eleventh or most LEGO who products.