User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170322025232/@comment-1827503-20171210023618

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170322025232
Revision as of 15:10, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I'd like to make an argument against the validity of TIDH. Namely, the nature of TIDH itself as a reprint of the original comics.

If TIDH were valid in its entirety, it would change twelve previously-invalid comics to valid. This means that those twelve comics would be validated by a connection to a later story, a state we have tended to avoid in the past.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20170322025232/@comment-1827503-20171210023618&oldid=3506707"