User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170322025232/@comment-27343779-20171208210747

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170322025232
Revision as of 15:10, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Sorry if a statement has been made by an admin, but I would like to say that in my opinion everything in The Incomplete Death's Head should be considered valid: It would be very subjective to consider which of the reprints are relevant to the story or not.

I also think that it would be a good idea to make a table with all the stories Death's Head I and II appear in and state which are valid or not (as we did with BBV Productions releases). I remember that I tried to create a page named "Death's Head - list of appearances" about it, but it was quickly deleted since so few of those were unambiguously considered valid at the time.

As for characters that only appear here, I agree with OttselSpy25: I think we can create pages for those, like we did for Star Trek characters from Assimilation.