User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170322025232/@comment-33695797-20180916201816

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20170322025232
Revision as of 15:11, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Okay, but I what I meant was is the purpose of this thread to decide the matter of the reprinted strips being valid (and the original already are) or are both the linking strips and reprinted the problem? I think we can somewhat include the reprinted strips in the pages for the linking ones. (e.g. “After watching [events of reprinted strip] on the archive, Tuck notices...) That way we don’t have to go in detail on those reprinted strips. We can say that the archive showed Death's Head fighting the Iron Man of 2020, but we don’t have to write all about the events of that.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20170322025232/@comment-33695797-20180916201816&oldid=3506795"