User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20171124185300/@comment-1789834-20180106172446

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20171124185300
Revision as of 15:12, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Okay, I just wanted us to all be aware of it before having our final say. Either way, it doesn't have to make any difference. At the end of the day, the character he was playing was still "The Fourth Doctor". Doctor Who has always left unanswered, ambiguous, fourth wall breaking moments in and they've neither impeded the story nor our way of dealing with their inclusion. We could just leave a behind the scenes note in the Story Notes section and have done with it, due to it not strictly being a Production Error.

In summary- I'm all for validity!

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20171124185300/@comment-1789834-20180106172446&oldid=3506915"