User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20180417160500/@comment-31010985-20180417175503

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20180417160500
Revision as of 15:14, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

After thinking about it I also agree with this proposal.

Could this decision be applied to other stories in the category that are not too parodic. There are stories like UNIT Recruiting Film which (from what I can tell) has no reason to be invalid. Also, the CIN and Comic Relief specials are meant to be comedic but is there any reason to deem One Born Every Minute or Looking for Pudsey invalid? If there is that's fine but it seems a bit weird to pick and choose which special minisodes to consider valid.

By the way Dimensions in Time was decided to be in violation of rule 2 at Thread:211495 anyways and there is an ongoing discussion about sequels and prequels to invalid stories looking for closure at Thread:212365.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20180417160500/@comment-31010985-20180417175503&oldid=3507008"