User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-43874324-20200319180118/@comment-5918438-20200703230744

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-43874324-20200319180118
Revision as of 15:14, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Popping in to direct everyone to two related threads which already reached definitive conclusions:

  • Thread:211198: Special Editions and Movie versions, which ruled that separate editions do not get their own pages, and are instead covered in Story notes
  • Thread:149385: Different versions of The Five Doctors, which ruled that "Both [versions of The Five Doctors] are valid. We deal with it as we do with any other conflicting information, one account suggests X, another account suggests Y."

What remains is to apply these rulings specifically to the question of "foreign language" dubs, and, if the "different versions" ruling does apply to dubs, how best to source information.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-43874324-20200319180118/@comment-5918438-20200703230744&oldid=3507041"