User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200707123828/@comment-39988495-20200707124121

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-45314928-20200707123828
Revision as of 15:19, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I believe it was the fact that they were part of the 10,000 Dawns series, and DWU elements crossed over into these stories, rather than the other way around. (So as they weren't entirely 100% DWU stories, like you mentioned.) I could be wrong though.

However, these stories being invalid is something I'm entirely opposed to, especially the Iris Wildthyme story, which strikes me as completely odd as the only Iris Wildthyme stories that aren't acknowledged by the wiki are charity publications (another interesting topic to say the least), and IW stories that make use of unlicensed elements, A Lady Doctor? for example.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-45314928-20200707123828/@comment-39988495-20200707124121&oldid=3507329"