User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200723133026/@comment-6032121-20200723185024

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-45692830-20200723133026
Revision as of 15:22, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

If it's valid, then yes, I think T:DAB is pretty straightforward on that point: it's a novel.

In fact, even if stays invalid, I think it will still need a dab term. If the framing narrative involves the Doctor and Yaz getting trapped in the joke book, then presumably the joke book exists in-universe, so we need the undabbed namespace for the in-universe book. I could be wrong.