User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-82.3.146.201-20170225142813

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120
Revision as of 15:24, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Having read some of the reasons, the only reason that keeps popping up is that it is discontinuous which in itself is a ridiculous argument.

If Dimensions in Time does not get declared valid, on the reasons that it is discontinuous, people hate it, it's a bit silly, that DWM four years later or negative acceptance and opinion.

- Then the 4 little rules are just there, and not being used. A story can't be invalid because Timothy Tarrent from Dublin hates it.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-82.3.146.201-20170225142813&oldid=3507641"