User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-95.145.155.227-20171125234745/@comment-31010985-20171226222829

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-95.145.155.227-20171125234745
Revision as of 15:40, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I can agree with that and although the narrative isn't as strong as some of the other poems it is there (the plot being the Krynoid grows the more it snows and so the more it kills people.) Another thing that is important to note is Now We Are Six Hundred is based upon Now We Are Six, another poetry book. Ode especially is restricted by A Good Hum (a poem in Six) for its lyrics quite heavily which is very evident if you search for the original on the internet.

In short, you've convinced me Ode to a Krynoid should be valid. Any other further arguments on the anthology?