Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20160909213807/@comment-24894325-20160914225318

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20160909213807
Revision as of 22:30, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

It seems that AeD's classification is very close to mine. And the new info/nothing new distinction seems to be a comic-book analogue of new footage/archival footage criterion used for TV stories. On the one hand, policies of other wikis are not directly applicable. On the other hand, it is instructive to know how a society devoted solely to comic books treats such things.

I have one proposal though. Let us exclude Petals from this discussion. I fear that it is too open to interpretation: is it mere memory? are they helping? are they watching? is he talking to them? are they talking to him? I suspect that context matters for that story and that it is one of the cases that would need to be discussed separately no matter the general rules.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.