User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-26845762-20170222025243/@comment-26845762-20170321144605

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-26845762-20170222025243
Revision as of 22:46, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

First off, we are a Dr Who wiki. If we start using images from Blake's 7 to illustrate some articles, what's to stop us from borrowing pictures from Wikipedia to illustrate The Algonquin? I say we keep our images only to those directly and intentionally related to Doctor Who or any of the other series we cover.

Keep in mind at we haven't gotten an admin to chime in too recently, but in my opinion those other things you've proposed would fall under "DWM illustrations". Admittedly, I was initially apprehensive, but if these are images which illustrate ideas that have been introduced within a valid source, why not use them?

Keep in mind that the bottom rung of my proposed "triangle" is for stories that were considered nonvalid only because of their possibility for variation. Shady was disqualified because it was "one big deleted scene", not because it could differ between viewers. I was thinking more Attack of the Graske, Choose the Future, stageplays, & Legacy.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-26845762-20170222025243/@comment-26845762-20170321144605&oldid=3527857"