User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151011004220/@comment-183721-20151011004740

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151011004220
Revision as of 23:22, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Personally, I find the whole "narratively ambiguous" label to be total garbage. People either are or they are not a companion. There's no in-between or middle ground. The tricky part here is that the episode itself leaves the question open-ended. Of course, the fact that there isn't really any definition of a companion doesn't help. I would say just leave them off the template unless Moffat or a BTS source confirms their status one way or the other.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151011004220/@comment-183721-20151011004740&oldid=3529718"