User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151031040623/@comment-24097347-20151031112526

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151031040623
Revision as of 23:24, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I think it would be okay to merge the articles K9 Mark I, K9 Mark 2 and K9 Mark 3. It's the same K9. Even in The Essential Book of K9 K9 Mark I and K9 Mark 2 are only listed as K9 Mark I. They share the same past and future.

However, I think the name K9 Mark 2 might still be okay since this name was actually seen in the episode Regeneration, directly after the regeneration and I can remember that it was shown during other episodes as well. After his regeneration in The Eclipse of the Korven no other name appeared. The only thing that looked different was his necklace. But he doesn't even look like the K9 on the K9 Mark 3 page.

And K9 Mark 3? Where does the name come from? The K9 looks different, but we do not know how this different looks were caused. In the Essential Book of K9 (Short Circuit) K9 remembers his past with Gryffin & the others + get's back his formally erased memories as K9 Mark I and K9 Mark 2, so it's clear that he is K9 Mark 2 or a regenerated form of K9 Mark 2. I would leave that information on the K9 Mark 2 page. He has K9 Mark 2's memories, personality and consciousnesses. Furthermore, unlike K9 Mark 2, the name K9 Mark 3 is mentioned nowhere at all.

I have the comic story at home, so if there are any questions?

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151031040623/@comment-24097347-20151031112526&oldid=3529822"